I recently presented a BenchTV Legal Education interactive CPD with Irma Remic (Solicitor). The BenchTV LinkedIn post gave the following summary: What factors will a Court take into consideration when making a family provision order
Ari Katsoulas appeared on behalf of the successful Plaintiff in a family provision claim brought against the estate of her late de facto partner. On 24 August 2023, his honour Justice Nixon of the Supreme
Ari Katsoulas appeared for the successful Plaintiffs in Quantum Investments (Aust) Pty Ltd & Ors v Zhi Wei Lin [2022] NSWSC 1387. In those proceedings, 6 Plaintiffs advanced amounts totalling $2,490,000 to the First Plaintiff
Ari Katsoulas appeared for the successful defendants in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in the case of Wheatley v Salmon [2022] NSWSC 395. The proceedings concerned a claim brought by the Plainitff claiming
Ari Katsoulas (together with E James) recently appeared for the successful Plaintiff in Hosseini v Genea Limited [2021] NSWSC 1568. The decision considered the interplay between the Human Tissue Act and Assisted Reproductive Technology Act
Ari Katsoulas recently appeared for the successful defendant in the matters of Re Earth Civil Australia Pty Ltd, RCG CBD Pty Ltd, Bluemine Pty Ltd, Diamondwish Pty Ltd and Rackforce Pty Ltd (all in liq)
Ari Katsoulas recently appeared for the successful Plaintiff in the matter of Re Ming Tian Real Property Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 912. The proceedings concerned an application brought by the administarors of the subject company to
Ari Katsoulas recently appeared with M Ashhurst SC for the successful Plaintiff resisting an application for security for costs in Union Steel Pty Ltd v Union Steel Investments Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 1511. The application
Ari Katsoulas recently appeared in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Ageist Pty Limited v More Than Skin Deep Pty Limited [2020] NSWSC 698. In those proceedings Ageist Pty Ltd – the mortgagee
Ari Katsoulas appeared before the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Re Earth Civil Australia Pty Ltd & Ors [2020] NSWSC 293. Ward CJ in Eq considered the admissibility of transcripts of recorded interviews
